The Ugly Secret Of Departing Employees And Trade Secret Theft?

Apple sued Chang Liu, a former employee, for stealing trade secrets when he left Apple to work for OpenAI.

According to the allegations contained in Apple's lawsuit, Liu, a senior system electrical engineer, left the company in January to work at OpenAI. After leaving, the engineer failed to return at least one laptop, on which he had discovered an authentication bug that allowed him to access Apple's internal network storage. Once accessed, the storage revealed confidential engineering documents.

The engineer allegedly did not report this bug. Instead, Apple alleges he contacted an employee who still worked at Apple and instructed her on how to access and copy even more confidential files for his use. Later, that employee also left Apple to work for OpenAI after studying specific confidential Apple files ahead of her interview at the urging of Liu.

Source: https://finance.yahoo.com/technology/ai/articles/lol-funny-apple-says-ex-190000424.html

Commentary

Organizations may be monitoring for theft of all kinds, including trade secrets, when an employee is fired or leaves on bad terms. However, neutral, and even amicable, departures should not be overlooked as relates to the potential for trade secret theft.

Employees who leave to pursue other opportunities often are acutely aware of where their former employer kept valuable files. They may retain credentials or access keys, or they may know of bugs in the system that would allow continued access even if all exit protocols were correctly followed.

To help reduce the risks of trade secret theft when an employee leaves, organizations should:

· Suspend credentials, access tokens, hardware access, and more the moment notice is given by the departing employee

· Regularly conduct security audits to detect and fix any bugs that would leave a pathway open to company files even when access is revoked

· Review the leaving employee's file access, download activity, printing, and email during the 90 days prior to their departure

· Forbid sharing of company devices, credentials, tokens, or any other access pathways between current and former employees

· Preserve any non-disclosure agreements where applicable and document the employee's exit interview records

· Never fail to engage in the above protocols simply because an employee is believed to be "friendly" or "harmless" when they depart

The final takeaway is that trade secret theft by departing employees often flies under the radar and the losses may not be realized until long after the employee is gone. Organizations that stay proactive and engage thorough departure protocols are better prepared to reduce the risks.

Finally, your opinion is important to us. Please complete the opinion survey:

Product

Articles

The Ugly Secret Of Departing Employees And Trade Secret Theft?

Apple sued a former engineer and alleged he stole valuable trade secrets after leaving to work for another company. We discuss the case and how organizations can help protect their information.

Underground AI Supercharges Phishing Attacks On Employers

Security researchers report that cybercriminals are using underground and jailbroken AI models to write sophisticated malware and phishing messages. We comment on how employers can respond.

Timing Mistakes: Termination After Accommodation Requests

A termination's timing brings litigation after a medical facility fires a worker soon after her request for an accommodation. We examine and discuss the termination risks for healthcare employers.

How Should Organizations Respond To "Cyber Responder" Betrayal?

Two American cybersecurity professionals pled guilty to conspiring with the ALPHV/BlackCat ransomware group to attack multiple U.S. organizations they were hired to protect. We comment.

Avoiding ADA Retaliation Traps In Healthcare Leave And Reassignment Decisions

Geisinger Health entities agreed to pay $450,000 and be subject to injunctive relief to resolve an EEOC lawsuit containing allegations of systemic denial of reasonable accommodations and discriminatory return to work practices under the ADA. We comment.