Why Relying On Restitution Is Not A Good Bet

A former Oglala Sioux Tribe employee was sentenced to six years and six months in federal prison for her role in an embezzlement scheme.

The employee worked for the tribe's Tribal Employment Rights Office from 2006 to 2024. Part of her duties included collecting checks from contractors for fees and transferring them to the tribe's revenue deposit where they would then be deposited into the tribe's general fund.

Between November 2017 and May 2024, the employee and another individual engaged in a scheme to divert those fee checks and instead deposit them into the co-defendant's bank account. The employee and the co-defendant then split those funds and used them to make purchases for themselves, including homes and vehicles.

According to the U.S. Department of Justice, the embezzlement scheme resulted in a $4.7 million loss. The employee was ordered to pay $4,744,415.36 in restitution.

Source: https://tribalbusinessnews.com/sections/policy-and-law/15682-former-oglala-sioux-tribe-employee-sentenced-to-6-years-for-4-7-million-tero-fraud; https://www.justice.gov/usao-sd/pr/nebraska-woman-sentenced-more-6-years-federal-prison-wire-fraud-and-money-laundering

Commentary

In the above matter, the employee was ordered to pay an amount in restitution. A restitution order may create the illusion of a pending recovery for embezzlement victims, but circumstances may not always allow for this.

According to the U.S. Department of Justice, the chances of full recovery are very low. In many cases, defendants who committed embezzlement spent the embezzled funds on personal items, travel, or medical bills and do not have assets to repay their victims.

Embezzlers may be able to make partial payments toward the restitution total. However, full restitution, especially for large restitution sums, is rare. Less than ten percent of total restitution in federal cases is ever fully recovered.

The final takeaway is that restitution orders are not reliable sources of funds to replace those lost through embezzlement schemes. Organizations may have to rely on other methods, such as insurance proceeds, to recoup stolen funds.

Sources: https://www.justice.gov/criminal/criminal-vns/restitution-process; https://www.congress.gov/crs-product/RL34138

Finally, your opinion is important to us. Please complete the opinion survey:

Product

Articles

Why Relying On Restitution Is Not A Good Bet

A tribal organization suffered a loss of nearly $5M after an employee's embezzlement scheme. We discuss why restitution does not always equal full recovery.

Staffing Shortage Is No Defense To PUMP Charges

A medical center was investigated by the U.S. Department of Labor after allegations of failing to allow breast milk pump breaks for nursing workers in violation of the PUMP Act. We examine why staffing shortages do not dictate breaks.

The Multi-Step Process For Healthcare Employers When Evaluating Accommodation Requests

A healthcare employer's leave policies lead to a sizeable disability discrimination settlement with the EEOC. Learn more about this case and about the difficulty of proving undue hardship.

One Controller, Higher Threat: The Embezzlement Risk Of Too Much Control

A controller of a small family textile company in California pled guilty and was sentenced to eight years in prison for embezzling more than $3.2M. We comment on the internal controls that can help employers lower their risk.

Ghost Companies Haunt Employers In Damaging Embezzlement Schemes

Ghost companies join ghost employees in the growing list of phantom scams used by embezzlers to steal. We provide an example and provide tips for lowering your risk.